NEWS8 May 2014
All MRS websites use cookies to help us improve our services. Any data collected is anonymised. If you continue using this site without accepting cookies you may experience some performance issues. Read about our cookies here.
All MRS websites use cookies to help us improve our services. Any data collected is anonymised. If you continue using this site without accepting cookies you may experience some performance issues. Read about our cookies here.
UK — TNS claims to have unlocked “the secret of irresistibility”.
During a five year study into brand irresistibility, TNS developed an Irresistibility Quotient (IQ) score, in order to calculate how appealing a brand is by gauging how well it meets the needs of its target consumers. The study involved analysing thousands of brands across 40 countries, and resulted in TNS identifying eight key drivers of irresistibility:
“Becoming one of the world’s strongest, most popular and recognisable brands does not happen by accident,” said Roz Calder, director of TNS’s NeedScope International. “These brands have scrutinised and applied the drivers of their irresistibility. These traits are deliberately and determinedly engineered over time, to make the brand an instinctive choice, and to make competing with it impossible.
“Rivals in their categories have two choices: either they can focus on becoming irresistible themselves, or they must be prepared to get out of the way.”
More information on the research can be found here.
Newsletter
Sign up for the latest news and opinion.
You will be asked to create an account which also gives you free access to premium Impact content.
Media evaluation firm Comscore has increased its revenue in the second quarter but has made a net loss of $44.9m, a… https://t.co/rAHZYxiapz
RT @ImpactMRS: Marginalised groups are asserting themselves in Latin America, with diverse creative energy and an embrace of indigenous cul…
There is no evidence that Facebook’s worldwide popularity is linked to widespread psychological harm, according to… https://t.co/wS1Um3JRS5
The world's leading job site for research and insight
Resources Group
Qualitative Senior Research Exec – London / Hybrid working
Up to circa £35,000 + Benefits
Resources Group
Project Manager – Quantitative – Dynamic Boutique Agency
£30–40,000 + good benefits
Spalding Goobey Associates
Senior Research Executive, Mixed Methods – Technology and IT
£Excellent Package
Ken Roberts
11 years ago
What a perfectly irresistible made-up measure for a jolly good belly laugh. And how might this advance the drive for more effective marketing? I blame the “success” of David Aaker and his made up measure of brand equity for this tiresome, never ending stream of made-up measures. Just what marketing science needs, another nonsense dependent variable? Whatever happened to SALES as a dependent variable? If research agencies had the courage they would put up sales as the dependent variable and mathematically show the causal drivers including both thoughts and feelings as behavioural drivers. Forethought routinely predicts change in market share based on these drivers with correlations of better than .8. I note that emotion is one measure. Emotion can be measured either physiologically or implicitly using time based techniques – if a respondent has provided their response in under one-second we can assume an implicit measure. My bet is TNS did neither. The example of “reassurance” and “control” as measures of emotions was worth a solid chuckle. TNS would do well to consult the academic literature on what are the primary emotions and how do they drive consumption behaviour. Now, excuse me while I return to the serious business of helping brands be successful.
Brought to you by:
©2025 The Market Research Society,
15 Northburgh Street, London EC1V 0JR
Tel: +44 (0)20 7490 4911
info@mrs.org.uk
The post-demographic consumerism trend means segments such age are often outdated, from @trendwatching #TrendSemLON
1 Comment
Ken Roberts
11 years ago
What a perfectly irresistible made-up measure for a jolly good belly laugh. And how might this advance the drive for more effective marketing? I blame the “success” of David Aaker and his made up measure of brand equity for this tiresome, never ending stream of made-up measures. Just what marketing science needs, another nonsense dependent variable? Whatever happened to SALES as a dependent variable? If research agencies had the courage they would put up sales as the dependent variable and mathematically show the causal drivers including both thoughts and feelings as behavioural drivers. Forethought routinely predicts change in market share based on these drivers with correlations of better than .8. I note that emotion is one measure. Emotion can be measured either physiologically or implicitly using time based techniques – if a respondent has provided their response in under one-second we can assume an implicit measure. My bet is TNS did neither. The example of “reassurance” and “control” as measures of emotions was worth a solid chuckle. TNS would do well to consult the academic literature on what are the primary emotions and how do they drive consumption behaviour. Now, excuse me while I return to the serious business of helping brands be successful.
Like Reply Report