NEWS16 April 2013
All MRS websites use cookies to help us improve our services. Any data collected is anonymised. If you continue using this site without accepting cookies you may experience some performance issues. Read about our cookies here.
All MRS websites use cookies to help us improve our services. Any data collected is anonymised. If you continue using this site without accepting cookies you may experience some performance issues. Read about our cookies here.
US — American market researchers have warned that presidential budget proposals could potentially threaten research companies using respondent incentives.
President Obama’s proposed budget wants Department of Labor and Internal Revenue Service programs to investigate and deter the “misclassification” of employees as independent contractors and to effectively eliminate the independent contractor protections provided by Section 530 of the tax code.
According to the Office of Management and Budget, the proposal would garner nearly a billion dollars in revenue for the Treasury over 10 years by eliminating the protective ‘safe harbour’ in Section 530.
Director of government affairs for the Marketing Research Association Howard Fienberg said Federal regulatory agencies had been sceptical, if not hostile to research respondents’ status as independent contractors in recent years.
He added: “These proposals represent a potential threat to every research company using respondent incentives, where they all might have to treat respondents as employees, unnecessarily increasing costs and making it even harder to attract respondents.”
The presidential move is similar to one at State level where the association successfully fought off amendments to Washington State’s new Employee Fair Classification Act, which would have forced the profession to treat respondents as employees.
Fienberg added: “We urge Congress to support the common sense Research Fairness Act and to counter the White House’s targeting of independent contractors.”
Newsletter
Sign up for the latest news and opinion.
You will be asked to create an account which also gives you free access to premium Impact content.
Media evaluation firm Comscore has increased its revenue in the second quarter but has made a net loss of $44.9m, a… https://t.co/rAHZYxiapz
RT @ImpactMRS: Marginalised groups are asserting themselves in Latin America, with diverse creative energy and an embrace of indigenous cul…
There is no evidence that Facebook’s worldwide popularity is linked to widespread psychological harm, according to… https://t.co/wS1Um3JRS5
The world's leading job site for research and insight
Resources Group
Qualitative Senior Research Exec – London / Hybrid working
Up to circa £35,000 + Benefits
Resources Group
Project Manager – Quantitative – Dynamic Boutique Agency
£30–40,000 + good benefits
Spalding Goobey Associates
Senior Research Executive, Mixed Methods – Technology and IT
£Excellent Package
Leigh Caldwell
12 years ago
I think it's entirely fair for respondents to pay tax on incentives. And it's easier for all concerned if agencies deduct it at source. The paperwork hassle of having to treat them as full employees is a genuine risk, though - so there should be a scheme allowing agencies to deduct a simple percentage equivalent to the standard income tax rate.
Roman
12 years ago
Taxes from incentives = lower interest from respondents side + higher tax administration expenses. Wow! I think all researchers should feel Big Bro's fingers on the neck. Hope, our guys in Kremlin wan't read this post. Great formula to support american research industry!
Brought to you by:
©2025 The Market Research Society,
15 Northburgh Street, London EC1V 0JR
Tel: +44 (0)20 7490 4911
info@mrs.org.uk
The post-demographic consumerism trend means segments such age are often outdated, from @trendwatching #TrendSemLON
2 Comments
Leigh Caldwell
12 years ago
I think it's entirely fair for respondents to pay tax on incentives. And it's easier for all concerned if agencies deduct it at source. The paperwork hassle of having to treat them as full employees is a genuine risk, though - so there should be a scheme allowing agencies to deduct a simple percentage equivalent to the standard income tax rate.
Like Reply Report
Roman
12 years ago
Taxes from incentives = lower interest from respondents side + higher tax administration expenses. Wow! I think all researchers should feel Big Bro's fingers on the neck. Hope, our guys in Kremlin wan't read this post. Great formula to support american research industry!
Like Reply Report