OPINION18 March 2011
All MRS websites use cookies to help us improve our services. Any data collected is anonymised. If you continue using this site without accepting cookies you may experience some performance issues. Read about our cookies here.
All MRS websites use cookies to help us improve our services. Any data collected is anonymised. If you continue using this site without accepting cookies you may experience some performance issues. Read about our cookies here.
OPINION18 March 2011
A company has launched with a web analytics tool that promises to turn advertisers into ‘Peeping Toms’. That’s not exactly the image the industry needs to convey to stay on the right side of legislators.
You might have noticed a bit of a fuss being made recently about online privacy. Apparently some people are uncomfortable with the idea that companies can track what sites they visit and what they do within those sites.
Legislators have responded with proposals to restrict data collection, or at least make more visible to consumers what data is being collected, while the industry tries to reassure web users that it’s not spying on them, merely trying to understand them better to present them with more relevant content.
Then we have Use It Better, a start-up company based in Poland, which has developed a tool to record user interactions with Flash websites – and proudly boasts that it can turn “advertisers and digital agencies into Peeping Toms to improve user experience”.
That’s so far off-message as to be impressive.
Newsletter
Sign up for the latest news and opinion.
You will be asked to create an account which also gives you free access to premium Impact content.
Media evaluation firm Comscore has increased its revenue in the second quarter but has made a net loss of $44.9m, a… https://t.co/rAHZYxiapz
RT @ImpactMRS: Marginalised groups are asserting themselves in Latin America, with diverse creative energy and an embrace of indigenous cul…
There is no evidence that Facebook’s worldwide popularity is linked to widespread psychological harm, according to… https://t.co/wS1Um3JRS5
The world's leading job site for research and insight
Resources Group
Qualitative Senior Research Exec – London / Hybrid working
Up to circa £35,000 + Benefits
Resources Group
Project Manager – Quantitative – Dynamic Boutique Agency
£30–40,000 + good benefits
Spalding Goobey Associates
Senior Research Executive, Mixed Methods – Technology and IT
£Excellent Package
Lukasz
14 years ago
Hi Brian, allow me to address your concerns. The idea of recording visits on the website is not new. There are already services like Clicktale, Userfly that do that on HTML websites. Use It Better is the first one to do that on Flash websites. Of course PR release title was meant to be controversial to get us more attention but in fact there's not much of controversy in this. Neither we nor others record any fragile data that may lead to identifying a user without wider context. We don't record IP numbers and any text inputed in texfields is obfuscated. What analytics now about a visit is just where a user pointed his mouse and what he clicked. It's far less disturbing than behavioural targeting not to mention cams in stores that record when I pick my nose. Analyzing real visitors activity gives better results than laboratory test and we really believe that it can be leveraged for a good purpose and user will benefit from this having better experience using web (which is often not that good after all). best, Lukasz
Brought to you by:
©2025 The Market Research Society,
15 Northburgh Street, London EC1V 0JR
Tel: +44 (0)20 7490 4911
info@mrs.org.uk
The post-demographic consumerism trend means segments such age are often outdated, from @trendwatching #TrendSemLON
2 Comments
Lukasz
14 years ago
Hi Brian, allow me to address your concerns. The idea of recording visits on the website is not new. There are already services like Clicktale, Userfly that do that on HTML websites. Use It Better is the first one to do that on Flash websites. Of course PR release title was meant to be controversial to get us more attention but in fact there's not much of controversy in this. Neither we nor others record any fragile data that may lead to identifying a user without wider context. We don't record IP numbers and any text inputed in texfields is obfuscated. What analytics now about a visit is just where a user pointed his mouse and what he clicked. It's far less disturbing than behavioural targeting not to mention cams in stores that record when I pick my nose. Analyzing real visitors activity gives better results than laboratory test and we really believe that it can be leveraged for a good purpose and user will benefit from this having better experience using web (which is often not that good after all). best, Lukasz
Like Reply Report
Rock 'Em Sock 'Em JBot
14 years ago
I hope you wash your hands before you send me your software....
Like Reply Report